Sunday, July 26, 2009

Connecting the Dots


Politics is not the study of governments but of progressions, the sequence of choices that lead from one paradigm to another. It is an ever-changing environment that can be as confusing for those involved as for those watching from the outside. That is how stories get changed and excuses are interpreted as lies.
Sometimes, the only way to read between the lines is to put the lines as closely as possible.


This is what happened to the county's Reverse 911 plan.



But somehow I find this trend more troubling.


Of course, there is no reason that those who have questions about this can't go to the Quorum Court meetings and ask the good judge. That is why the public forum, mandated by the state's "sunshine laws," was created.

Edit: Unfortunately at the time of this post, I did not foresee the stories to which I linked disappearing. Also unfortunately, I do not remember what information these stories contained. When newspapers fail to archive properly, history can be lost.

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Quick thoughts

What's going on at the Daily Record? Is this more evidence of the decline of newspapers? Admittedly, the newspapers were crazy to give away their work just because it was online, but is this the right move or the right move 10 years ago when the Internet was on the rise?

I hope to continue posting links to the Daily Record site, but anyone who wants to read it will apparently have to pay.

And don't expect to keep getting the Morning News for free much longer. They were behind the Daily Record in cutting staff too, but both papers ended up taking the same road.

Blue or Green?

Someone needs to remind the Rogers Civil Service Commission what the definition of oversight is. And please do it a little more forcefully than the local papers did.

Oversight in this case is akin to the Court of Appeals. The commission is supposed to decide, after the fact, if the decisions made by the police and fire administration were fair and just. It is similar to the checks and balances that formed the basis of the federal government. And the check never comes before the action that prompts it.

It was a bit surprising when the Morning News printed this story telling how the commission wanted to give up some of its power, specifically the power to hear appeals. An officer must be suspended for three days before the commission is willing to hear the grievance.

Forgive my ignorance, but I thought suspensions could be based on and justified by numerous smaller disciplinary actions, such as letters of reprimand, that can no longer be appealed.

A day later, this story in the Daily Record detailed the commission's attempt to rob the police chief of his authority in hiring and promoting his officers. Then again, maybe a board comprised of people with undisclosed jobs (or, most likely, former jobs) has a better idea what makes a good cop or firefighter than the men hired to lead those departments.

That sounds more likely, so shame on Mayor Steve Womack for going out of his way to find the best qualified people to oversee the city's two largest departments when he would have been better served by choosing now-retired busybodies with an over-inflated sense of importance.

There may be some jealousy directing these actions. The "commission," which is listed on the city's web site as a "board," is one of the few attached to the city that does not regularly vote on issues coming before the city. The Parks Commission meets monthly, and its votes impact policy. The Planning Commission meets twice monthly, and its votes shape development within the city. The Civil Service Board meets as-needed, and that apparently isn't enough for commissioners worried about becoming irrelevant, even though they fill the same role they always have, at least until the new provisions are approved.

In Walmart We Trust

To all those seeking the latest scandalous rhetoric about Sam Walton's Frankenstein monster, I regret that I must disappoint. In Benton County, Arkansas, it is not possible to have a one-sided view of Walmart, calling the World's Largest Retailer evil for its low wages, its policies against unions, and its devastating effect on smaller competitors (which is everyone) without acknowledging, even if it is with a sense of guilt, the remarkably positive impact the company's charitable giving has had within our own communities. This is neither a retelling of Walmart's good deeds, but to tell this story, we must first tip our hat to the much (self) heralded Walmart Foundation.

At its heart, this tale is about Habitat for Humanity, the Bible-based house builders who have put roofs over many heads except, at least in Benton County, for its own.

The basics can be dispensed with quickly, as the details are in this account. The local Habitat chapter spotted a nice piece of land in Rogers that it couldn't afford, so it sold its home in Bentonville to raise the money, but it only had land in Rogers and no building, so it rented its old building from its new owner for an obscenely bad rate leaving it trying to raise more money to keep the place it had and even more money to build the place it needed, all the while professing faith that God would bring them through.

God, at least in this case, is the Walmart Foundation.

This is the most common prayer in Benton County, where non-profits are always seeking grants from "large investors." For all practical purposes, there are only two organizations that qualify — the Walmart Foundation and the Walton Family Foundation.

The prayer goes something like this:

"Dear Walmart, we come to you in our hour of need, asking that you once again bless us with your generosity. We know we are but ants in your radiant glory, but we beseech you to grant our humble request. All the good we plan, we will do while carrying your banner that yours will be the honor.

"And overlook our faults, though they be many, as we have not the resources for flawless planning that you possess. Our ideas, our proposals, our ponderings all must pale in comparison to the magnificent endeavors you have successfully undertaken. In our imperfection, we fall well short of the example you have set.

"Your name shall be always on our lips and always on our press releases.

"In Sam's name we pray.

"Amen."

The exaggeration is only slight. This community has elevated Walmart and the founding family to the role of savior. And it is true that many organization is still intact thanks to a generous check from Walmart or a Walton. But maybe there are too many of them.

For many non-profits, living in Walmart's shadow means putting once hand out to shake and the other out to take the money. There is an expectation that Walmart is obligated to support such groups because of its wealth, but that only masks the shortcomings of those seeking a handout. Walmart's money has more than compensated for many a sloppy organization, just like it will probably do with Habitat.

Walmart may be an enabler, but it is time for all these vagabond groups reaching toward the Home Office with their tin cups to put away their cardboard signs and start working to make their own money. Otherwise, Rogers may want to start enforcing its panhandling ban.

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Streamlined?

In the latest version of the same old story — this one or, to a lesser extent, this one — sales taxes are down all over, and I'll include Rogers. A small increase is a loss compared to the big jumps it was getting.
Can we finally call the streamlined sales tax a failed experiment? Sure, most of these cities that are facing wild inconsistencies in sales tax revenue could benefit from simply removing the tax cap for businesses. (You see, individuals must pay tax on our full purchase, no matter how high, but businesses can stop paying taxes once their purchase hits $2,500. It's five paragraphs into this story, proving it was no surprise.) But that does not explain Springdale. It's easy to laugh at the city that caused its own downfall by chasing Sam's Club out of town, but that doesn't explain the near constant drop in sales tax revenue.
Here's the real problem. In hopes of encouraging a national mandate for Internet sales tax, Arkansas joined a growing, but misguided, group of states who have instituted the streamlined sales tax. This contingent charges taxes based on where a sale ends, not where it begins. To make it simple, if someone in Little Rock buys a product from Springdale and has it shipped to Little Rock, the Little Rock taxes apply and Little Rock gets the money. The buyer is taxed based on where he or she is, not where the item begins.
That means anything shipped out of state is not taxed.
Imagine if this was reversed. A purchase that originates in Little Rock with a company in Springdale is hit with Springdale taxes and Springdale gets the money. Replace Little Rock with Dallas. And now with Ontario. And with London. At that point it doesn't matter where the buyer is, because the purchase takes place where the business is. (In the aftershocks of this realization, state legislators would barely notice that merchants would then only have to follow one tax rate instead of all of them.)
Businessmen and women around Arkansas will slowly realize this and begin a financial revolution within this state. Of course, this could all be ended simply by common sense action at the General Assembly ... or a miracle, whichever is more likely.

Quick thoughts

Why have there been so many stories in The Morning News about Rogers Little Theater lately? Is it because editor Rusty Turner is also on the theater's board? There's almost as many of those stories as there are front-page stories about Crystal Bridges in the Benton County Daily Record. Well, not quite that many. We can't think of any logical reason that may-never-come museum is always at the top of A-1.

Priorities

It is the duty of the City Council to protect the interests of the city, but too often, special interest groups interfere. It seems that fate has befallen Rogers.

Councilman Bob Goodwin (or, in the original Morning News account, Rob Goodman) has broken ranks with his fellow elected officials, a sign of outside influence interfering with his judgment.

The group that has apparently purchased Goodwin's vote is the Rogers taxpayer. There is no other way to explain his concern, expressed during the city's June 9 council meeting, for finding less expensive alternative to maintain and improve the intersections and roadways of downtown Rogers.

The seven other council members understand the value of unity, as a whole in favor of continuing the project. The validity of the project is not in question, rather the speed at which the city's leaders latch on to the first proposal that comes their way. Any delay could cost the downtown business owners days or even weeks of delay as other ideas are considered.

The downtown business owners are also right to back this proposal unquestioningly, as the absence of any meaningful customer traffic is certainly the fault of those historic brick intersections.

Even if drawn out discussion would have resulted in the same conclusion, the undermining of resident confidence by working to ensure their interests are protected would only jeopardize the residents' interests.

But it seems Goodwin is finally coming around. After listening to the merchant's support of the intersection proposal, Goodwin refused to comment to the daily record, which can only mean he is succumbing to the group thinking. It will be a proud day in Rogers when projects like this can be approved and completed without any delay for discussion, no matter how good other ideas may be.